PRXCX vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
PRXCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 14, 1986. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund | -0.18% | 5.51% | 2.75% | 7.64% | -9.93% | 2.68% | 4.39% | 7.31% | 0.75% | 5.19% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRXCX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than LSMSX's -0.27% return.
PRXCX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXCX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRXCX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PRXCX
LSMSX
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRXCX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.67 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 0.89 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.71 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 1.98 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRXCX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.67 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.25 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.58 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXCX and LSMSX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
PRXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund | 6.41% | 6.00% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 2.21% | 2.82% | 2.80% | 2.94% | 3.11% | 3.09% | 3.33% | 3.42% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXCX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXCX and LSMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXCX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.67% | -15.00% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.56% | -6.21% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -15.00% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.62% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -2.88% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.21% | -0.49% |
Volatility
PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 1.10%. This indicates that PRXCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRXCX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.10% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 1.60% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 5.78% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 4.44% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 4.52% | -0.40% |