PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXCX vs. LSMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXCX achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.43% return.


PRXCX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.99%
YTD
2.21%
6M
3.04%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
2.25%

LSMSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.64%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRXCX
T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund
2.21%3.99%3.62%7.64%-9.93%2.68%4.39%7.31%0.75%5.10%
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
2.43%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXCX and LSMSX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.82

The correlation between PRXCX and LSMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXCX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXCX
PRXCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PRXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRXCXLSMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.70

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.86

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

9.60

+1.55

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the LSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXCX and LSMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXCX drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXCX and LSMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXCXLSMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.67%

-15.00%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-2.82%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.68%

-7.49%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-15.00%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-2.84%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.84%

-0.03%

Volatility

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 0.79%. This indicates that PRXCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXCXLSMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

0.79%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

2.06%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

2.84%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

4.48%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.14%

4.49%

-0.35%

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXCX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXCX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison

PRXCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than LSMSX's 3.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.84%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%
PRXCX
T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund
4.60%4.58%4.10%3.50%2.21%2.82%2.80%2.94%3.11%3.09%3.33%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXCX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRXCX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to LSMSX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXCX dropped -21.67% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.

PRXCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXCX and LSMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer