PRVT vs. QABA
PRVT (Tema Listed Private Managers ETF) and QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. PRVT is actively managed, while QABA is passively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PRVT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QABA.
Performance
PRVT vs. QABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRVT
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QABA
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- YTD
- 23.85%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.30K | $7.65K | $7.65K | |
| $784.12K | $558.11K | $480.08K |
PRVT vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF | 6.54% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRVT and QABA is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2026 | 0.47 |
PRVT vs. QABA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRVT
QABA
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
PRVT
QABA
-
Financial Services
PRVT
QABA
Basic Materials
PRVT
QABA
-
Utilities
PRVT
QABA
-
Communication Services
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Consumer Defensive
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Energy
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Healthcare
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Industrials
PRVT
-
QABA
Technology
PRVT
-
QABA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRVT vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank
PRVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QABA
PRVT vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Listed Private Managers ETF (PRVT) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRVT | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRVT vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRVT drawdown since its inception was -4.07%, smaller than the maximum QABA drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVT and QABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRVT | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -49.30% | +45.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.75% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -11.34% | +10.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility
PRVT vs. QABA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRVT | QABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 22.08% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 26.23% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 28.60% | -2.24% |
PRVT vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRVT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRVT vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison
PRVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRVT Tema Listed Private Managers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund | 2.21% | 2.52% | 2.37% | 2.71% | 2.10% | 1.68% | 2.55% | 1.95% | 1.90% | 1.42% | 1.13% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRVT and QABA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PRVT.
QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.00% for PRVT.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PRVT and 0.60% for QABA.
Find the right allocation for PRVT and QABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer