PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSVX vs. TRBCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSVX achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PRSVX has underperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.


PRSVX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.63%

TRBCX

1D
-0.69%
1M
5.17%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.64%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
28.80%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
17.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
17.21%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
5.48%18.78%48.46%49.42%-38.57%17.54%34.73%29.97%2.00%36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSVX and TRBCX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1993

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between PRSVX and TRBCX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSVX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBCX
TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRSVXTRBCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

1.34

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

4.54

+10.29

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSVX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRSVXTRBCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.37

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.58

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.78

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.60

+0.04

Drawdowns

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSVX drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum TRBCX drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSVX and TRBCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSVXTRBCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-54.56%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-17.01%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.60%

-23.08%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-43.63%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.97%

-43.63%

+2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.69%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-11.31%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

5.01%

-2.64%

Volatility

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 3.57%. This indicates that PRSVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSVXTRBCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.57%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

13.37%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

16.66%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

24.03%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

22.79%

-1.76%

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSVX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

PRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than TRBCX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.09%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%
TRBCX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund
4.97%5.25%18.16%3.49%5.87%9.38%1.19%0.36%2.44%2.94%0.67%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRSVX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSVX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to TRBCX (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSVX dropped -55.37% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

PRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSVX and TRBCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer