PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSVX vs. DFSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRSVX having a 17.21% return and DFSCX slightly lower at 16.94%. Over the past 10 years, PRSVX has underperformed DFSCX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while DFSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.


PRSVX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.63%

DFSCX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.89%
YTD
16.94%
6M
16.37%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
11.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
17.21%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
16.94%9.65%11.43%17.93%-12.49%33.70%6.61%20.68%-11.60%10.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSVX and DFSCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1991

0.93

The correlation between PRSVX and DFSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSVX vs. DFSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DFSCX
DFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRSVXDFSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.16

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.05

3.11

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

4.65

-0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.83

14.95

-0.12

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the DFSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSVX and DFSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRSVXDFSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.16

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.43

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.50

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.61

+0.03

Drawdowns

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSVX drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum DFSCX drawdown of -63.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSVX and DFSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSVXDFSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-63.07%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.17%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.60%

-27.01%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-27.01%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.97%

-46.88%

+5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-9.91%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.53%

-0.16%

Volatility

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) and DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio (DFSCX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSVXDFSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

4.48%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

11.59%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.70%

17.57%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.01%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.03%

22.64%

-1.61%

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSVX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DFSCX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSVX vs. DFSCX - Dividend Comparison

PRSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than DFSCX's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSCX
DFA U.S. Micro Cap Portfolio
0.82%1.03%0.97%2.48%5.16%10.77%0.87%2.80%5.50%5.05%0.90%6.33%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.09%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PRSVX and DFSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRSVX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DFSCX (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSVX dropped -55.37% vs DFSCX's -63.07%.

DFSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSVX and DFSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer