PRSD vs. SCHO
PRSD (State Street Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. PRSD is actively managed, while SCHO is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRSD charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.
Performance
PRSD vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRSD achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.74% return.
PRSD
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
PRSD vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRSD State Street Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF | 1.71% | 1.13% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.74% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRSD and SCHO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRSD vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
PRSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHO
PRSD vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRSD) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRSD | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRSD vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRSD drawdown since its inception was -0.73%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSD and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRSD | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -5.69% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -0.61% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility
PRSD vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRSD | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63% | 1.41% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.63% | 1.99% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.63% | 1.56% | +0.07% |
PRSD vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRSD has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRSD vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
PRSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than SCHO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRSD State Street Short Duration IG Public & Private Credit ETF | 3.31% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRSD and SCHO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PRSD.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.31% for PRSD.
PRSD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PRSD and 0.03% for SCHO.
Find the right allocation for PRSD and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer