PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRYX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund (PRRYX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRYX achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRYX has underperformed LTFIX with an annualized return of 7.55%, while LTFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.


PRRYX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.16%
YTD
4.41%
6M
3.95%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
11.86%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.55%

LTFIX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.75%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.05%
1Y
22.88%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
11.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRYX
Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund
4.41%9.79%9.46%18.15%-10.13%9.94%7.97%15.70%-7.49%16.09%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
9.67%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%17.73%16.47%27.27%-9.03%22.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRYX and LTFIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.95

The correlation between PRRYX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRYX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRYX
PRRYX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund (PRRYX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRYXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.97

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.78

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.68

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

12.06

-3.61

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRYX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRYXLTFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.97

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.61

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.47

+0.40

Drawdowns

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRYX drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRYX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRYXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-52.73%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-8.71%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.36%

-15.70%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.44%

-26.80%

+12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.30%

-33.50%

+13.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-7.64%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.93%

-0.39%

Volatility

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund (PRRYX) is 2.09%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that PRRYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRYXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

3.34%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

9.46%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.53%

11.84%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.22%

15.46%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.42%

15.84%

-6.42%

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRYX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRYX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

PRRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than LTFIX's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
7.96%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%
PRRYX
Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund
1.74%1.81%1.99%2.08%10.70%9.79%1.06%3.62%9.16%3.21%0.74%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PRRYX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PRRYX (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRYX dropped -20.30% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

LTFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRYX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer