PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRUX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRUX achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 14.85% return.


PRRUX

1D
1.06%
1M
1.43%
YTD
6.88%
6M
6.52%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
10.27%

FWLSX

1D
1.49%
1M
3.15%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.82%
1Y
31.96%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
6.88%12.94%15.08%21.03%-15.14%16.51%13.46%20.38%-9.28%10.29%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
14.85%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-8.33%10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRUX and FWLSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between PRRUX and FWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRUX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRUX
PRRUX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PRRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRUXFWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.44

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.35

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

14.50

-5.74

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRUX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRUX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum FWLSX drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRUX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRUXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-31.32%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-9.49%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-15.38%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-27.40%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

0.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.98%

-5.41%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.18%

-0.13%

Volatility

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) is 4.45%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that PRRUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRUXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.74%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

11.48%

-2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

13.52%

-2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

15.27%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.69%

16.11%

-2.42%

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRUX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRUX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

PRRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than FWLSX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
3.99%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%0.00%0.00%
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
1.58%1.69%1.40%1.75%13.51%11.30%1.54%7.54%15.23%5.04%0.80%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PRRUX and FWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (5.74%) compared to PRRUX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRUX dropped -28.85% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRUX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer