PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRUX vs. FDFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRUX achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than FDFPX's 12.26% return.


PRRUX

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.32%
6M
5.80%
YTD
5.89%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
13.46%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.78%
ALL TIME*
9.36%

FDFPX

1D
2.29%
1M
-0.99%
6M
8.37%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.70%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
5.89%12.94%15.08%21.03%-15.14%16.51%13.46%6.17%
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
12.26%22.81%17.81%20.93%-18.57%16.84%18.54%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRUX and FDFPX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.95

The correlation between PRRUX and FDFPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRUX vs. FDFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRRUX
PRRUX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PRRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFPX
FDFPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRUXFDFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

2.40

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

10.04

-4.46

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the FDFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRUX and FDFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRUX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum FDFPX drawdown of -31.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRUX and FDFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRUXFDFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-31.22%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-9.54%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-15.42%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-27.41%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-2.19%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-5.76%

+1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.28%

-0.19%

Volatility

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) is 3.52%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund (FDFPX) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that PRRUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRUXFDFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

4.37%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

12.20%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

14.21%

-2.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

15.34%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

17.21%

-3.58%

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRUX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFPX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRUX vs. FDFPX - Dividend Comparison

PRRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than FDFPX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFPX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2065 Fund
3.81%2.87%6.56%2.22%5.41%8.52%5.38%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
1.60%1.69%1.40%1.75%13.51%11.30%1.54%7.54%15.23%5.04%0.80%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PRRUX and FDFPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFPX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PRRUX (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRUX dropped -28.85% vs FDFPX's -31.22%.

FDFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRUX and FDFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer