PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRTX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRTX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than URTRX's 8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRTX has underperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.


PRRTX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.20%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.73%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
6.04%

URTRX

1D
0.21%
1M
3.32%
YTD
8.16%
6M
8.62%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
8.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
3.05%8.59%6.18%15.42%-7.91%6.89%5.46%13.40%-6.22%13.50%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
8.16%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%12.23%9.25%17.13%-6.98%16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRTX and URTRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.93

The correlation between PRRTX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRTX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRTX
PRRTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PRRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRTXURTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.44

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

14.88

-4.55

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRTX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRTXURTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.54

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.68

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.78

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.61

+0.29

Drawdowns

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRTX drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRTX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRTXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-34.10%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-5.29%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-9.12%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.71%

-19.52%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.59%

-23.56%

+6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-4.15%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.22%

-0.24%

Volatility

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) is 1.69%, while USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that PRRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRTXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

2.54%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

5.81%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33%

7.15%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

9.69%

-2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

10.35%

-3.06%

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRTX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRTX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

PRRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than URTRX's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.08%2.14%2.57%2.66%10.69%8.38%1.54%3.76%7.57%2.95%0.73%2.72%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.27%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PRRTX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URTRX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to PRRTX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRTX dropped -16.59% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRTX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer