PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRTX vs. PGTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRTX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than PGTYX's 24.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRTX has underperformed PGTYX with an annualized return of 5.74%, while PGTYX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.63% annualized return.


PRRTX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.40%
6M
2.53%
YTD
2.41%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
5.74%
ALL TIME*
6.47%

PGTYX

1D
5.46%
1M
-4.06%
6M
23.41%
YTD
24.87%
1Y
39.74%
3Y*
28.57%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
23.63%
ALL TIME*
20.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.41%8.59%6.18%15.42%-7.91%6.89%5.46%13.40%-6.22%13.50%
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
24.87%23.31%27.88%53.82%-32.30%11.72%70.92%47.50%-6.72%47.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRTX and PGTYX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.78

The correlation between PRRTX and PGTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRTX vs. PGTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRRTX
PRRTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PGTYX
PGTYX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRTXPGTYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.00

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

6.28

-0.01

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the PGTYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRTX and PGTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRTX drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum PGTYX drawdown of -42.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRTX and PGTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRTXPGTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-42.09%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-17.94%

+13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-28.36%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.71%

-42.09%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.59%

-42.09%

+25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-13.46%

+12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-6.63%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

5.70%

-4.68%

Volatility

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) is 1.66%, while Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) has a volatility of 10.48%. This indicates that PRRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRTXPGTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

10.48%

-8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

23.11%

-18.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

26.81%

-21.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

25.89%

-18.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

24.53%

-17.28%

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRTX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PGTYX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Dividend Comparison

PRRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than PGTYX's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
8.67%10.83%6.40%0.57%1.71%21.15%13.60%2.63%9.44%6.75%1.01%4.56%
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.09%2.14%2.57%2.66%10.69%8.38%1.54%3.76%7.57%2.95%0.73%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRRTX and PGTYX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTYX has higher volatility (10.48%) compared to PRRTX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRTX dropped -16.59% vs PGTYX's -42.09%.

PGTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRTX and PGTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer