PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRTX vs. PGTYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRTX achieves a 3.05% return, which is significantly lower than PGTYX's 44.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRTX has underperformed PGTYX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while PGTYX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.20% annualized return.


PRRTX

1D
0.22%
1M
2.20%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.73%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
6.04%

PGTYX

1D
2.21%
1M
23.84%
YTD
44.30%
6M
43.47%
1Y
76.53%
3Y*
37.69%
5Y*
20.43%
10Y*
26.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
3.05%8.59%6.18%15.42%-7.91%6.89%5.46%13.40%-6.22%13.50%
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
44.30%23.31%27.88%53.82%-32.30%11.72%70.92%47.50%-6.72%47.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRTX and PGTYX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.79

The correlation between PRRTX and PGTYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRTX vs. PGTYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRTX
PRRTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PRRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PGTYX
PGTYX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PGTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PGTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRTXPGTYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

5.80

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

18.52

-8.19

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the PGTYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRTX and PGTYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRTXPGTYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

3.57

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.82

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

1.09

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Drawdowns

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRTX drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum PGTYX drawdown of -42.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRTX and PGTYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRTXPGTYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-42.09%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-13.58%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-28.36%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.71%

-42.09%

+30.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.59%

-42.09%

+25.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-6.61%

+4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

4.25%

-3.27%

Volatility

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) is 1.69%, while Putnam Global Technology Fund (PGTYX) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that PRRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGTYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRTXPGTYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

7.68%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

17.73%

-13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.33%

22.07%

-16.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

24.98%

-17.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.29%

24.11%

-16.82%

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRTX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PGTYX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRTX vs. PGTYX - Dividend Comparison

PRRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than PGTYX's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGTYX
Putnam Global Technology Fund
7.51%10.83%6.40%0.57%1.71%21.15%13.60%2.63%9.44%6.75%1.01%4.56%
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.08%2.14%2.57%2.66%10.69%8.38%1.54%3.76%7.57%2.95%0.73%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRRTX and PGTYX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGTYX has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to PRRTX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRTX dropped -16.59% vs PGTYX's -42.09%.

PGTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRTX and PGTYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer