PRRSX vs. FRIOX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX).
PRRSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003. FRIOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 2.41% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 4.32% |
FRIOX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C | -0.25% | 6.06% | 6.79% | 8.31% | -15.51% | 17.80% | -2.13% | 16.74% | -2.56% | 5.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly higher than FRIOX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has outperformed FRIOX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while FRIOX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.26% annualized return.
PRRSX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 5.61%
FRIOX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FRIOX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRRSX vs. FRIOX — Risk / Return Rank
PRRSX
FRIOX
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRRSX | FRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.71 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 0.95 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 3.49 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRRSX | FRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.71 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.45 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.66 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRRSX and FRIOX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Dividend Comparison
PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than FRIOX's 3.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 0.87% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
FRIOX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C | 3.69% | 3.68% | 3.68% | 4.09% | 5.00% | 1.02% | 3.92% | 4.76% | 4.46% | 3.69% | 4.05% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than FRIOX's maximum drawdown of -34.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and FRIOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRRSX | FRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -34.54% | -43.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -4.38% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -18.83% | -18.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -34.54% | -11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -3.18% | -7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -3.66% | -9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 1.05% | +2.27% |
Volatility
PRRSX vs. FRIOX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class C (FRIOX) at 1.63%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRIOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRRSX | FRIOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 1.63% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 2.86% | +7.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 4.92% | +12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 6.53% | +13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.86% | 9.49% | +12.37% |