PRRSX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
PRRSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 30, 2003. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 4.08% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 4.32% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.33% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has outperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 5.78%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.
PRRSX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 6.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRRSX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
PRRSX
FRINX
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRRSX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 0.91 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 1.23 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.09 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 4.54 | -2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRRSX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.91 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.54 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.75 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRRSX and FRINX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than FRINX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 0.85% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than FRINX's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRRSX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -34.50% | -43.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -4.28% | -9.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -18.30% | -18.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | -34.50% | -11.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -2.72% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -3.41% | -9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.03% | +2.32% |
Volatility
PRRSX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.65%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRRSX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 1.65% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 2.87% | +7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 4.92% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 6.51% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 9.50% | +12.37% |