PRNHX vs. FVIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I (FVIFX).
PRNHX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 3, 1960. FVIFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003.
Performance
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund | -5.34% | 3.27% | 8.80% | 21.35% | -36.96% | 9.96% | 58.05% | 56.50% | 3.79% | 31.59% |
FVIFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I | 0.25% | 11.29% | 10.37% | 19.68% | -9.15% | 35.08% | 9.87% | 31.79% | -17.76% | 15.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRNHX achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than FVIFX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PRNHX has outperformed FVIFX with an annualized return of 12.93%, while FVIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.84% annualized return.
PRNHX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -10.89%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -3.56%
- 1Y
- 10.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- -1.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
FVIFX
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRNHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FVIFX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRNHX vs. FVIFX — Risk / Return Rank
PRNHX
FVIFX
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I (FVIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRNHX | FVIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.32 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.06 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.71 | 4.37 | -2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRNHX | FVIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.84 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.43 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.40 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRNHX and FVIFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Dividend Comparison
PRNHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.52%, more than FVIFX's 8.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNHX T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund | 12.52% | 11.85% | 9.82% | 0.00% | 4.72% | 17.09% | 13.67% | 23.46% | 13.94% | 8.27% | 5.77% | 7.72% |
FVIFX Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I | 8.34% | 8.36% | 12.68% | 1.05% | 0.64% | 4.68% | 0.68% | 3.33% | 15.05% | 3.49% | 0.91% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRNHX drawdown since its inception was -70.96%, which is greater than FVIFX's maximum drawdown of -66.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNHX and FVIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRNHX | FVIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.96% | -66.85% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.70% | -14.97% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.37% | -24.33% | -24.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.37% | -48.52% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.08% | -9.92% | -17.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.39% | -9.71% | -8.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.63% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PRNHX vs. FVIFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Fund Class I (FVIFX) at 5.33%. This indicates that PRNHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRNHX | FVIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 5.33% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 11.63% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.87% | 21.51% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 20.46% | +3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 22.12% | +0.55% |