PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNHX vs. BUFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Buffalo Large Cap Fund (BUFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNHX achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than BUFEX's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PRNHX has underperformed BUFEX with an annualized return of 14.70%, while BUFEX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.


PRNHX

1D
1.21%
1M
5.05%
YTD
15.06%
6M
12.99%
1Y
27.38%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
14.70%

BUFEX

1D
-0.18%
1M
6.14%
YTD
10.23%
6M
9.54%
1Y
26.73%
3Y*
23.45%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
16.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
15.06%3.27%8.80%21.35%-36.96%9.96%58.05%56.50%3.79%31.59%
BUFEX
Buffalo Large Cap Fund
10.23%16.27%28.86%40.39%-28.64%25.55%28.08%31.76%-1.60%24.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNHX and BUFEX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 1995

0.83

The correlation between PRNHX and BUFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNHX vs. BUFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNHX
PRNHX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PRNHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFEX
BUFEX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BUFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Buffalo Large Cap Fund (BUFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNHXBUFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.00

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

7.12

+1.45

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BUFEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNHX and BUFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNHXBUFEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.97

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.71

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.83

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.56

-0.08

Drawdowns

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNHX drawdown since its inception was -70.96%, which is greater than BUFEX's maximum drawdown of -54.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNHX and BUFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNHXBUFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.96%

-54.12%

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-13.76%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-21.46%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-32.54%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-32.54%

-15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-0.18%

-11.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-9.23%

-9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.86%

-0.47%

Volatility

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Buffalo Large Cap Fund (BUFEX) at 3.34%. This indicates that PRNHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNHXBUFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

3.34%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

10.68%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.51%

13.98%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.58%

19.75%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.83%

19.49%

+3.34%

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFEX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNHX vs. BUFEX - Dividend Comparison

PRNHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than BUFEX's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFEX
Buffalo Large Cap Fund
6.12%6.75%3.65%0.03%3.07%25.69%0.14%1.42%6.00%5.33%0.00%6.83%
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
10.30%11.85%9.82%0.00%4.72%17.09%13.67%23.46%13.94%8.27%5.77%7.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNHX and BUFEX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNHX has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to BUFEX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNHX dropped -70.96% vs BUFEX's -54.12%.

BUFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNHX and BUFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer