PRN vs. SBIT
PRN (Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PRN returned 34.52% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
PRN vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.
PRN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- YTD
- 39.44%
- 1Y
- 98.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.92M | $11.20M | $10.20M | |
| $29.57M | $32.71M | $46.48M |
PRN vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 13.74% | 11.16% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 39.44% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and SBIT is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
SBIT
PRN vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.35 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 5.19 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -91.35% | +31.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.60% | -47.94% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.94% | -77.87% | +59.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -69.07% | +58.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 21.67% | -15.54% |
Volatility
PRN vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is 15.11%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that PRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 18.09% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.53% | 67.10% | -38.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | 88.65% | -54.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 96.10% | -69.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 96.10% | -71.22% |
PRN vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 4.03% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and SBIT have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to PRN (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 34.52% for PRN. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 34.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer