PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. ITA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. ITA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 41.80% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed ITA with an annualized return of 18.51%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.82% annualized return.


PRN

1D
0.59%
1M
6.86%
YTD
41.80%
6M
45.38%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
36.96%
5Y*
20.18%
10Y*
18.51%

ITA

1D
-1.51%
1M
4.93%
YTD
4.82%
6M
11.61%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
26.89%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
14.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
41.80%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
4.82%48.64%15.81%14.33%9.96%9.39%-13.57%30.51%-7.22%35.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and ITA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.78

The correlation between PRN and ITA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
ITA

Industrials

79.3%
99.8%

Technology

19.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

PRN
79.3%
ITA
99.8%

Technology

PRN
19.4%
ITA
0.1%

Basic Materials

PRN
1.8%
ITA

-

Energy

PRN
1.6%
ITA

-

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
1.2%
ITA

-

Financial Services

PRN
0.1%
ITA

-

Communication Services

PRN

-

ITA

-

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

ITA

-

Healthcare

PRN

-

ITA

-

Real Estate

PRN

-

ITA

-

Utilities

PRN

-

ITA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNITADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.22

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

1.65

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

4.49

+10.96

PRN vs. ITA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the ITA Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and ITA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNITADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

1.26

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.80

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.64

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

PRN vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and ITA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNITADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-59.72%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-15.82%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-15.82%

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-18.72%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-51.00%

+14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-10.19%

+9.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-9.46%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

5.82%

-1.59%

Volatility

PRN vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 10.95% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 7.28%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNITADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.95%

7.28%

+3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.22%

17.47%

+5.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.66%

20.86%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

20.02%

+5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.17%

23.14%

+1.03%

PRN vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ITA's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.48%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and ITA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to ITA (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs ITA's -59.72%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 14.82% for ITA. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 7.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 14.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.38% for ITA.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and ITA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer