PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMYX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMYX achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than SSBRX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMYX has underperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 3.39%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.88% annualized return.


PRMYX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.79%
6M
2.83%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
3.39%

SSBRX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.60%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.67%
1Y
15.39%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
7.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
2.79%8.38%6.31%9.82%-4.22%0.02%1.29%8.54%-5.19%5.10%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.50%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMYX and SSBRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.79

The correlation between PRMYX and SSBRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (10 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMYX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMYX
PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRMYXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.44

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

15.67

-5.31

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMYX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMYXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.79

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.61

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.81

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.74

+0.09

Drawdowns

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMYX drawdown since its inception was -9.74%, smaller than the maximum SSBRX drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMYX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMYXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-21.96%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.50%

-4.44%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-7.48%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-21.13%

+11.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.74%

-21.96%

+12.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.22%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.70%

-3.72%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.97%

-0.13%

Volatility

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) is 1.42%, while State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that PRMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMYXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.74%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

4.36%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.58%

5.49%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

8.83%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

9.82%

-5.36%

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PRMYX and SSBRX have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRMYX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

PRMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than SSBRX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRMYX
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
3.65%3.30%3.15%3.62%7.46%2.47%2.17%2.97%1.73%0.55%1.53%3.90%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.70%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PRMYX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSBRX has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to PRMYX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMYX dropped -9.74% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMYX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer