PRMYX vs. FRHMX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PRMYX (Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund) and FRHMX (Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PRMYX returned 4.09%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for FRHMX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRMYX charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FRHMX.

Performance

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMYX achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FRHMX's 3.97% return.

PRMYX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 2.79%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 8.90%
• 3Y*: 8.16%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 3.39%

FRHMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 3.97%
• 6M: 4.34%
• 1Y: 10.12%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRMYX Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund	2.79%	8.38%	6.31%	9.82%	-4.22%	0.02%	1.29%	0.71%
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	3.97%	10.02%	4.50%	8.28%	-11.48%	2.98%	8.79%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMYX and FRHMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	0.84

The correlation between PRMYX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRMYX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMYX

PRMYX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PRMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PRMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PRMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PRMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PRMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FRHMX

FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRMYX	FRHMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.41	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.55	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.48	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.92	-0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.37	12.51	-2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMYX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRMYX	FRHMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.41	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.56	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.82	+0.01

Drawdowns

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMYX drawdown since its inception was -9.74%, smaller than the maximum FRHMX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMYX and FRHMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRMYX	FRHMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.74%	-15.96%	+6.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.50%	-3.42%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.35%	-4.90%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.24%	-15.96%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.16%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-3.50%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	0.80%	+0.04%

Volatility

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund (PRMYX) is 1.42%, while Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that PRMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRMYX	FRHMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.67%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.52%	3.42%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.58%	4.17%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.19%	5.28%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.46%	5.15%	-0.69%

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMYX has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PRMYX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

PRMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than FRHMX's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	3.26%	3.22%	3.24%	3.02%	4.77%	3.78%	2.61%	1.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRMYX Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund	3.65%	3.30%	3.15%	3.62%	7.46%	2.47%	2.17%	2.97%	1.73%	0.55%	1.53%	3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRMYX and FRHMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, PRMYX and FRHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRMYX or FRHMX?

FRHMX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to PRMYX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMYX dropped -9.74% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.