PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIR.L is traded in GBp, while IBGM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBGM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIR.L achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than IBGM.L's -2.35% return.


PRIR.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.90%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
-2.07%
10Y*

IBGM.L

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
-2.35%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
0.02%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
39.50%
10Y*
31.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIR.L
Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.78%5.74%-3.03%4.65%-13.31%-10.41%10.86%3.33%
IBGM.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.35%5.38%-3.53%465.78%-3.14%-9.55%20.87%119.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIR.L and IBGM.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.62

Over the past year, PRIR.L and IBGM.L have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.62, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIR.L
PRIR.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PRIR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IBGM.L
IBGM.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IBGM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBGM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIR.LIBGM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.01

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

0.00

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

0.01

+1.35

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the IBGM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIR.L and IBGM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIR.LIBGM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.00

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.20

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.21

-0.33

Drawdowns

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIR.L drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, roughly equal to the maximum IBGM.L drawdown of -26.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIR.L and IBGM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIR.LIBGM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.98%

-26.66%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-6.20%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-6.85%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.58%

-21.27%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.21%

-5.51%

-12.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-4.98%

-13.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

2.84%

-0.83%

Volatility

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIR.L) is 1.81%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IBGM.L) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that PRIR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBGM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIR.LIBGM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

2.59%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

4.94%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.71%

6.31%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.66%

193.47%

-184.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.68%

138.63%

-127.95%

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIR.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBGM.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIR.L vs. IBGM.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, while IBGM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBGM.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%1.33%2.78%79.03%13.18%0.00%8.74%63.75%0.74%0.74%0.77%1.07%
PRIR.L
Amundi Prime Euro Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.75%2.72%2.07%1.88%1.83%1.57%1.64%1.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PRIR.L and IBGM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIR.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIR.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IBGM.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIR.L and 0.15% for IBGM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIR.L and IBGM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer