PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIP.L is traded in GBp, while VUCP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUCP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIP.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VUCP.L's -0.23% return.


PRIP.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.71%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-5.09%
1Y
1.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VUCP.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.74%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
-0.79%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
1.89%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRIP.L and VUCP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.95

The correlation between PRIP.L and VUCP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIP.L
PRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VUCP.L
VUCP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUCP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIP.LVUCP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.16

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.14

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

2.59

-2.22

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the VUCP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIP.L and VUCP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIP.LVUCP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

0.95

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.27

-0.18

Drawdowns

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum VUCP.L drawdown of -16.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIP.L and VUCP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIP.LVUCP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-16.84%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-5.00%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.78%

-7.92%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-7.67%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.20%

+2.75%

Volatility

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) have volatilities of 1.68% and 1.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIP.LVUCP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

1.73%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

4.46%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.82%

6.05%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.90%

8.51%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.90%

9.92%

-2.02%

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VUCP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIP.L vs. VUCP.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRIP.L
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUCP.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.86%4.02%4.73%3.57%2.79%1.85%2.36%2.64%2.58%2.57%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PRIP.L and VUCP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VUCP.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIP.L and 0.09% for VUCP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIP.L and VUCP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer