PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIJ.L is traded in GBp, while VJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VJPU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIJ.L achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly lower than VJPU.L's 20.12% return.


PRIJ.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
6.51%
YTD
15.18%
6M
12.83%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

VJPU.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.88%
YTD
20.12%
6M
21.04%
1Y
54.82%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PRIJ.L
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.18%15.76%7.02%11.63%1.11%
VJPU.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.12%22.15%25.96%28.86%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIJ.L and VJPU.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.72

The correlation between PRIJ.L and VJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRIJ.L
VJPU.L

Industrials

26.2%
26.6%

Technology

17.5%
17.4%

Financial Services

16.4%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
12.8%

Communication Services

8.2%
7.1%

Healthcare

6.0%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.7%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

1.3%
1.3%

Energy

0.9%
1.0%

Industrials

PRIJ.L
26.2%
VJPU.L
26.6%

Technology

PRIJ.L
17.5%
VJPU.L
17.4%

Financial Services

PRIJ.L
16.4%
VJPU.L
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PRIJ.L
12.7%
VJPU.L
12.8%

Communication Services

PRIJ.L
8.2%
VJPU.L
7.1%

Healthcare

PRIJ.L
6.0%
VJPU.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

PRIJ.L
4.0%
VJPU.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

PRIJ.L
3.7%
VJPU.L
4.3%

Real Estate

PRIJ.L
3.1%
VJPU.L
3.4%

Utilities

PRIJ.L
1.3%
VJPU.L
1.3%

Energy

PRIJ.L
0.9%
VJPU.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIJ.L
PRIJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPU.L
VJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIJ.LVJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

6.27

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

21.16

-12.61

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the VJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIJ.L and VJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIJ.LVJPU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.88

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.23

-0.72

Drawdowns

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPU.L drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIJ.L and VJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIJ.LVJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-24.99%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.70%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-24.99%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.28%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-3.58%

-2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.58%

+0.95%

Volatility

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (VJPU.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that PRIJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIJ.LVJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.69%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

14.76%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

18.99%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

20.28%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

20.28%

-3.51%

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIJ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIJ.L vs. VJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRIJ.L nor VJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIJ.L and VJPU.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for VJPU.L.

PRIJ.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while VJPU.L tracks FTSE Japan (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIJ.L and 0.20% for VJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIJ.L and VJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer