PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIJ.L achieves a 15.18% return, which is significantly higher than JARI.L's 2.58% return.


PRIJ.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
6.51%
YTD
15.18%
6M
12.83%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*

JARI.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.23%
YTD
2.58%
6M
1.49%
1Y
12.60%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRIJ.L
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)
15.18%15.76%7.02%11.63%-8.38%-3.87%
JARI.L
Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C)
2.58%10.15%-2.37%5.00%-10.79%-1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIJ.L and JARI.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2021

0.73

The correlation between PRIJ.L and JARI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRIJ.L
JARI.L

Industrials

26.2%
18.2%

Technology

17.5%
17.3%

Financial Services

16.4%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
17.3%

Communication Services

8.2%
10.3%

Healthcare

6.0%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.6%

Real Estate

3.1%
3.5%

Utilities

1.3%

-

Energy

0.9%

-

Industrials

PRIJ.L
26.2%
JARI.L
18.2%

Technology

PRIJ.L
17.5%
JARI.L
17.3%

Financial Services

PRIJ.L
16.4%
JARI.L
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PRIJ.L
12.7%
JARI.L
17.3%

Communication Services

PRIJ.L
8.2%
JARI.L
10.3%

Healthcare

PRIJ.L
6.0%
JARI.L
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRIJ.L
4.0%
JARI.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

PRIJ.L
3.7%
JARI.L
0.6%

Real Estate

PRIJ.L
3.1%
JARI.L
3.5%

Utilities

PRIJ.L
1.3%
JARI.L

-

Energy

PRIJ.L
0.9%
JARI.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIJ.L
PRIJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JARI.L
JARI.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JARI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JARI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
JARI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JARI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JARI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIJ.LJARI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.20

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

3.31

+5.24

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the JARI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIJ.L and JARI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIJ.LJARI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.72

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.12

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.02

+0.49

Drawdowns

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, which is greater than JARI.L's maximum drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIJ.L and JARI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIJ.LJARI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-22.78%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-10.47%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

-14.89%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

-22.78%

+3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-4.56%

+4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-12.30%

+6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.80%

-0.27%

Volatility

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (C) (JARI.L) at 4.18%. This indicates that PRIJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JARI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIJ.LJARI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.18%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

13.96%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

17.35%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.75%

17.35%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.73%

-0.96%

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIJ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JARI.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIJ.L vs. JARI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRIJ.L nor JARI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIJ.L and JARI.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JARI.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIJ.L and 0.18% for JARI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIJ.L and JARI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer