PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L
PRIJ.L (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) and CJPU.L (iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds - PRIJ.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while CJPU.L tracks the MSCI Japan Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRIJ.L returned 9.54%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for CJPU.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRIJ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for CJPU.L.
Performance
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRIJ.L is traded in GBp, while CJPU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CJPU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRIJ.L having a 12.51% return and CJPU.L slightly higher at 12.60%.
PRIJ.L
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CJPU.L
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 30.09%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 12.51% | 17.80% | 9.02% | 13.78% | -6.35% | 2.49% | 12.24% | 11.21% |
CJPU.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.60% | 17.14% | 9.20% | 14.24% | -7.49% | 1.45% | 12.67% | 10.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIJ.L and CJPU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PRIJ.L and CJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRIJ.L
CJPU.L
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRIJ.L | CJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.84 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 8.61 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, roughly equal to the maximum CJPU.L drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIJ.L and CJPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIJ.L | CJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -24.62% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -10.54% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.98% | -14.29% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.16% | -18.51% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -8.44% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -6.35% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.49% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) is 5.76%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that PRIJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRIJ.L | CJPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 6.83% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 17.53% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 20.79% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 17.07% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.77% | -0.11% |
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIJ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CJPU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRIJ.L vs. CJPU.L - Dividend Comparison
PRIJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, while CJPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CJPU.L iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.71% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, PRIJ.L and CJPU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for CJPU.L.
PRIJ.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIJ.L and 0.12% for CJPU.L.
Find the right allocation for PRIJ.L and CJPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer