PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIG.L is traded in GBp, while VAGS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAGS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIG.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than VAGS.L's 0.06% return.


PRIG.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
-0.67%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*

VAGS.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.16%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.94%-0.19%-1.79%-1.09%-8.28%-5.90%5.97%-2.71%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.06%4.96%2.39%5.94%-13.72%-2.14%5.52%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIG.L and VAGS.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2019

0.48

The correlation between PRIG.L and VAGS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRIG.L
VAGS.L

Technology

86.2%

-

Healthcare

7.7%

-

Communication Services

3.5%

-

Financial Services

2.6%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PRIG.L
86.2%
VAGS.L

-

Healthcare

PRIG.L
7.7%
VAGS.L

-

Communication Services

PRIG.L
3.5%
VAGS.L

-

Financial Services

PRIG.L
2.6%
VAGS.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Energy

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Industrials

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Real Estate

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Utilities

PRIG.L

-

VAGS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIG.L
PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VAGS.L
VAGS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAGS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIG.LVAGS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.15

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.18

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

3.48

-2.92

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the VAGS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIG.L and VAGS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIG.LVAGS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.90

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.06

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.11

-0.23

Drawdowns

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.02%, which is greater than VAGS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIG.L and VAGS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIG.LVAGS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

-17.99%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-2.67%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.35%

-3.93%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-17.60%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.89%

-3.83%

-20.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-6.65%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

0.91%

+1.40%

Volatility

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) is 1.34%, while Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (VAGS.L) has a volatility of 1.43%. This indicates that PRIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIG.LVAGS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.43%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

2.77%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

3.52%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

4.86%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

4.58%

+3.18%

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VAGS.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIG.L vs. VAGS.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while VAGS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.99%2.96%2.31%1.97%1.72%1.50%1.75%1.23%
VAGS.L
Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIG.L and VAGS.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VAGS.L.

PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while VAGS.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIG.L and 0.10% for VAGS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIG.L and VAGS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer