PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIG.L is traded in GBp, while SAAA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SAAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIG.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than SAAA.L's 0.11% return.


PRIG.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
-0.67%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*

SAAA.L

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.11%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
-2.01%
10Y*
0.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.94%-0.19%-1.79%-1.09%-8.28%-5.90%5.97%6.26%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.11%2.96%-3.46%2.32%-11.40%-6.94%8.12%4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIG.L and SAAA.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019

0.88

The correlation between PRIG.L and SAAA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIG.L
PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

SAAA.L
SAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIG.LSAAA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.76

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

1.66

-1.11

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIG.L and SAAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIG.LSAAA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

0.64

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

-0.30

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.12

-0.24

Drawdowns

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.02%, which is greater than SAAA.L's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIG.L and SAAA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIG.LSAAA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

-24.70%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

-3.83%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.35%

-5.68%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

-18.85%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.89%

-18.74%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-9.88%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.74%

+0.57%

Volatility

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) have volatilities of 1.34% and 1.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIG.LSAAA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.39%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

3.45%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

4.49%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

6.75%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

7.87%

-0.11%

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SAAA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIG.L vs. SAAA.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than SAAA.L's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.99%2.96%2.31%1.97%1.72%1.50%1.75%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.69%2.48%2.34%1.57%0.76%0.48%0.61%0.89%0.87%0.81%0.83%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIG.L and SAAA.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SAAA.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIG.L and 0.20% for SAAA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIG.L and SAAA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer