PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRIG.L (Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)) and GLBL.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) are both Global Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, from Amundi and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRIG.L returned -2.20%/yr vs -2.95%/yr for GLBL.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRIG.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLBL.L.

Performance

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PRIG.L is traded in GBp, while GLBL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLBL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIG.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than GLBL.L's -1.58% return.

PRIG.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: -1.58%
• 1Y: 1.28%
• 3Y*: -0.67%
• 5Y*: -2.20%
• 10Y*: —

GLBL.L

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: -1.58%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 0.08%
• 3Y*: -2.06%
• 5Y*: -2.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	-0.94%	-0.19%	-1.79%	-1.09%	-8.28%	-5.90%	5.97%	6.26%
GLBL.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged	-1.58%	-2.39%	-2.65%	-2.45%	-7.22%	-5.08%	3.70%	5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIG.L and GLBL.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019	0.94

The correlation between PRIG.L and GLBL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRIG.L	GLBL.L
Technology	86.2%	0.1%
Healthcare	7.7%	0.2%
Communication Services	3.5%	0.3%
Financial Services	2.6%	1.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIG.L

PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

GLBL.L

GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRIG.L	GLBL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	0.02	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	0.06	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.01	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	0.02	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.55	0.03	+0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIG.L and GLBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRIG.L	GLBL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	0.02	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	-0.44	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	-0.16	+0.04

Drawdowns

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.02%, roughly equal to the maximum GLBL.L drawdown of -25.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIG.L and GLBL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRIG.L	GLBL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.02%	-25.17%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.46%	-5.16%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.35%	-8.09%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.03%	-18.62%	+1.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.89%	-24.13%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.42%	-12.84%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	2.68%	-0.37%

Volatility

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) have volatilities of 1.34% and 1.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRIG.L	GLBL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	1.37%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.53%	3.60%	-0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.87%	5.00%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.13%	6.74%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.76%	7.27%	+0.49%

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLBL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PRIG.L vs. GLBL.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than GLBL.L's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLBL.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged	0.03%	0.03%	0.03%	0.02%	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)	2.99%	2.96%	2.31%	1.97%	1.72%	1.50%	1.75%	1.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRIG.L and GLBL.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PRIG.L and GLBL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PRIG.L or GLBL.L?

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRIG.L or GLBL.L?

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLBL.L.

What is the main difference between PRIG.L and GLBL.L?

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIG.L and 0.10% for GLBL.L.