PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIC.L is traded in GBp, while SUKC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SUKC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIC.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than SUKC.L's -1.46% return.


PRIC.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.02%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*

SUKC.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
-0.24%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIC.L
Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.37%5.75%-2.51%3.51%-10.37%-8.76%6.60%2.97%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-1.46%3.90%4.82%7.17%-5.78%-0.79%3.08%2.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIC.L and SUKC.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019

0.29

The correlation between PRIC.L and SUKC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIC.L
PRIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PRIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SUKC.L
SUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIC.LSUKC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.00

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.06

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.12

+0.85

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIC.L and SUKC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIC.LSUKC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.03

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.32

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.49

-0.58

Drawdowns

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIC.L drawdown since its inception was -24.61%, which is greater than SUKC.L's maximum drawdown of -11.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIC.L and SUKC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIC.LSUKC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.61%

-11.63%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-3.75%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

-3.75%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-11.63%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.60%

-2.11%

-14.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-1.41%

-12.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.02%

+0.93%

Volatility

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) at 1.17%. This indicates that PRIC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUKC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIC.LSUKC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

1.17%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

4.45%

-0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

6.88%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

4.72%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.35%

4.63%

+2.72%

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIC.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SUKC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIC.L vs. SUKC.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while SUKC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRIC.L
Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%2.29%4.41%3.05%1.76%1.77%1.97%1.93%1.88%2.44%2.40%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIC.L and SUKC.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIC.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIC.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUKC.L.

PRIC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIC.L and 0.20% for SUKC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIC.L and SUKC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer