PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIC.L vs. PACW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRIC.L is traded in GBp, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIC.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.


PRIC.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.02%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*

PACW.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.92%
6M
12.31%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRIC.L and PACW.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

0.12

The correlation between PRIC.L and PACW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIC.L
PRIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PRIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PACW.L
PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIC.LPACW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.55

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

4.27

-3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

17.43

-16.70

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIC.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIC.LPACW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

2.89

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

1.24

-1.32

Drawdowns

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIC.L drawdown since its inception was -24.61%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIC.L and PACW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIC.LPACW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.61%

-17.68%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.89%

-7.06%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.60%

-0.46%

-16.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.39%

-3.02%

-11.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.73%

+1.22%

Volatility

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIC.L) is 1.49%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that PRIC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIC.LPACW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

2.93%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.33%

7.75%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

10.42%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

13.91%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.35%

13.91%

-6.56%

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIC.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIC.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than PACW.L's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PACW.L
Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income
1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRIC.L
Amundi Prime Euro Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIC.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIC.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIC.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for PACW.L.

PRIC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while PACW.L is Global Equities. PRIC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIC.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIC.L and PACW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer