PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHAX vs. PDBZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Muni High Income Fund (PRHAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHAX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHAX has underperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 2.31%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.


PRHAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.20%
6M
0.53%
YTD
1.41%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
2.31%
ALL TIME*
4.78%

PDBZX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.50%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.75%
1Y
1.96%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
2.49%
ALL TIME*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRHAX
PGIM Muni High Income Fund
1.41%4.42%4.74%8.02%-14.37%4.07%4.57%8.67%0.99%7.80%
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
-0.75%7.70%2.87%7.70%-14.33%-1.46%8.01%14.76%-0.72%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHAX and PDBZX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1996

0.52

The correlation between PRHAX and PDBZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.65 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHAX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRHAX
PRHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBZX
PDBZX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PDBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Muni High Income Fund (PRHAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRHAXPDBZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.12

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.94

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

2.33

+5.29

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the PDBZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHAX and PDBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHAX drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum PDBZX drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHAX and PDBZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHAXPDBZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.43%

-20.88%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-3.00%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.99%

-4.85%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-20.61%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.43%

-20.88%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-2.74%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-2.30%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.21%

-0.37%

Volatility

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Muni High Income Fund (PRHAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) have volatilities of 0.99% and 1.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHAXPDBZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

1.01%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

3.46%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

4.22%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.02%

6.05%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

5.38%

-0.28%

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHAX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHAX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison

PRHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than PDBZX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDBZX
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z
4.23%4.54%4.79%4.60%5.73%2.73%2.94%10.36%4.01%2.87%3.92%3.33%
PRHAX
PGIM Muni High Income Fund
3.61%5.23%3.89%2.93%2.92%2.68%3.41%3.39%3.87%3.80%4.14%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRHAX and PDBZX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDBZX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to PRHAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHAX dropped -19.43% vs PDBZX's -20.88%.

PRHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHAX and PDBZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer