PRGTX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -7.19% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -10.07% | 47.09% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -14.54% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a -7.19% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -14.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRGTX having a 15.10% annualized return and TBCIX not far ahead at 15.65%.
PRGTX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.19%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
TBCIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGTX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGTX
TBCIX
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGTX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.54 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 0.94 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 0.50 | +1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 1.75 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGTX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.54 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.44 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.69 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.66 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGTX and TBCIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 6.09% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, which is greater than TBCIX's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGTX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -43.26% | -27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -16.96% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.29% | -43.26% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.29% | -43.26% | -22.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -16.96% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -8.15% | -13.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 4.87% | -0.43% |
Volatility
PRGTX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) at 5.58%. This indicates that PRGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGTX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 5.58% | +3.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 11.76% | +5.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 22.49% | +5.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 23.88% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 22.69% | +5.48% |