PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGTX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 49.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGTX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 17.66%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.41% annualized return.


PRGTX

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.87%
6M
21.92%
YTD
25.08%
1Y
42.17%
3Y*
31.27%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
17.66%
ALL TIME*
11.98%

FSELX

1D
0.96%
1M
-8.05%
6M
33.10%
YTD
49.63%
1Y
84.99%
3Y*
51.58%
5Y*
38.61%
10Y*
35.41%
ALL TIME*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
25.08%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
49.63%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGTX and FSELX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.86

The correlation between PRGTX and FSELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGTX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRGTXFSELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.07

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

12.68

-5.56

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGTX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGTXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.18%

-82.54%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-26.87%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-36.31%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.29%

-46.37%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.29%

-46.37%

-18.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.24%

-20.88%

+7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-28.63%

+7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.52%

6.50%

-0.98%

Volatility

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) is 11.53%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 16.24%. This indicates that PRGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGTXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

16.24%

-4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.45%

34.43%

-8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

40.77%

-11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.65%

40.41%

-7.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.83%

35.84%

-7.01%

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGTX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGTX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
10.95%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PRGTX and FSELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSELX has higher volatility (16.24%) compared to PRGTX (11.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGTX dropped -71.18% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGTX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer