PRGTX vs. FIKHX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX).

PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000. FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

PRGTX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRGTX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	-2.98%	27.28%	33.12%	55.92%	-55.53%	8.85%	75.77%	34.22%	-4.02%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	0.00%	24.77%	35.52%	59.89%	-35.93%	27.74%	64.56%	51.18%	-17.39%

Returns By Period

PRGTX

• 1D: 4.55%
• 1M: -6.22%
• YTD: -2.98%
• 6M: -1.87%
• 1Y: 37.61%
• 3Y*: 27.49%
• 5Y*: 3.68%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

FIKHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGTX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.

PRGTX

T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund

FIKHX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

PRGTX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGTX

PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 80
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGTX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between PRGTX and FIKHX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PRGTX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIKHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	27.71%	5.05%	0.15%	24.67%	15.81%	9.46%	10.03%
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z	9.85%	9.85%	7.33%	3.86%	3.32%	11.52%	7.42%	2.64%	22.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.10%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.68%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRGTX	FIKHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.07%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.79%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.20%	—	—