PRGTX vs. FDCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000. FDCPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 28, 1985.
Performance
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -7.19% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -10.07% | 47.09% |
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio | 9.40% | 54.44% | 22.40% | 33.52% | -28.63% | 23.68% | 46.07% | 40.15% | -6.30% | 32.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a -7.19% return, which is significantly lower than FDCPX's 9.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGTX has underperformed FDCPX with an annualized return of 15.10%, while FDCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.61% annualized return.
PRGTX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.19%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
FDCPX
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -8.67%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 74.26%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 18.00%
- 10Y*
- 21.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDCPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGTX vs. FDCPX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGTX
FDCPX
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGTX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 2.58 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 3.38 | -1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.49 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 4.85 | -2.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 23.39 | -16.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGTX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.58 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.82 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 1.00 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.51 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGTX and FDCPX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Dividend Comparison
PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
FDCPX Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio | 13.15% | 14.38% | 7.58% | 0.51% | 17.72% | 16.95% | 8.81% | 12.15% | 23.69% | 10.50% | 6.57% | 4.53% |
Drawdowns
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, smaller than the maximum FDCPX drawdown of -81.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and FDCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGTX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -81.96% | +10.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -14.36% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.29% | -35.29% | -30.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.29% | -35.29% | -30.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -9.09% | -3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -26.23% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 2.98% | +1.46% |
Volatility
PRGTX vs. FDCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) is 8.97%, while Fidelity Select Tech Hardware Portfolio (FDCPX) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that PRGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGTX | FDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 11.19% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 18.17% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 28.72% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 22.00% | +9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 21.59% | +6.58% |