PRFSX vs. FSTFX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Tax Free Short-Intermediate Fund (PRFSX) and Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX).
PRFSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 22, 1983. FSTFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 24, 1986.
Performance
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFSX T. Rowe Price Tax Free Short-Intermediate Fund | 0.17% | 5.77% | 3.96% | 5.73% | -4.24% | 0.17% | 3.31% | 3.66% | 1.13% | 1.74% |
FSTFX Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund | -0.18% | 5.36% | 2.36% | 3.85% | -4.90% | 0.15% | 3.23% | 4.19% | 1.28% | 2.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFSX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSTFX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFSX has outperformed FSTFX with an annualized return of 1.98%, while FSTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.
PRFSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 4.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
FSTFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTFX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRFSX vs. FSTFX — Risk / Return Rank
PRFSX
FSTFX
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Tax Free Short-Intermediate Fund (PRFSX) and Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRFSX | FSTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.99 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.83 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.69 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.12 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 8.94 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRFSX | FSTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.99 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.69 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 0.80 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.57 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFSX and FSTFX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Dividend Comparison
PRFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than FSTFX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFSX T. Rowe Price Tax Free Short-Intermediate Fund | 3.47% | 4.12% | 4.43% | 3.67% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.49% | 1.62% | 1.48% | 1.37% | 1.34% | 1.41% |
FSTFX Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund | 2.35% | 2.99% | 2.03% | 1.70% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.58% | 1.92% | 1.65% | 1.56% | 1.60% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFSX drawdown since its inception was -6.97%, smaller than the maximum FSTFX drawdown of -9.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFSX and FSTFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFSX | FSTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -9.50% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.18% | -2.00% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.97% | -7.65% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.97% | -7.65% | +0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.49% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -0.98% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 0.47% | +0.09% |
Volatility
PRFSX vs. FSTFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Tax Free Short-Intermediate Fund (PRFSX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) at 0.53%. This indicates that PRFSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRFSX | FSTFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.53% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.25% | 0.94% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45% | 2.14% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 1.91% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 2.04% | +0.13% |