PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRFP.L is traded in GBp, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFP.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.79% return.


PRFP.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*

MWOZ.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
6M
9.49%
YTD
10.79%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
-0.84%-5.86%
MWOZ.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
10.79%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFP.L and MWOZ.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFP.L
PRFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOZ.L
MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFP.LMWOZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.39

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.38

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

13.30

-12.54

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFP.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFP.L and MWOZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFP.LMWOZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-18.50%

-14.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-6.63%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.04%

-0.44%

-18.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-2.99%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

1.68%

+1.05%

Volatility

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFP.LMWOZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.77%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

8.05%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

10.88%

-3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

13.82%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

13.82%

+1.20%

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFP.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

PRFP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than MWOZ.L's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MWOZ.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist
1.19%1.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
5.58%5.38%5.08%5.39%5.57%4.36%4.81%4.64%5.05%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFP.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRFP.L.

PRFP.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRFP.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFP.L and MWOZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer