PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFP.L vs. MIST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRFP.L is traded in GBp, while MIST.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MIST.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFP.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than MIST.L's 2.23% return.


PRFP.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*

MIST.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.06%
YTD
2.23%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
-0.84%-4.46%6.43%3.44%-12.08%4.09%2.23%-4.16%
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation
2.23%4.61%5.53%5.01%-1.12%-0.36%0.63%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFP.L and MIST.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFP.L
PRFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MIST.L
MIST.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MIST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MIST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFP.LMIST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

7.17

-6.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

101.64

-101.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

493.90

-493.14

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the MIST.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFP.L and MIST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than MIST.L's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFP.L and MIST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFP.LMIST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-3.70%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-0.04%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-0.20%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-2.45%

-17.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.04%

0.00%

-19.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-0.38%

-15.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

0.01%

+2.72%

Volatility

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation (MIST.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that PRFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFP.LMIST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

0.10%

+2.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

0.28%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

0.38%

+7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

0.58%

+10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

0.98%

+14.04%

Dividends

PRFP.L vs. MIST.L - Dividend Comparison

PRFP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, while MIST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
5.58%5.38%5.08%5.39%5.57%4.36%4.81%4.64%5.05%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFP.L and MIST.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFP.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF, while MIST.L tracks PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF Institutional GBP (Hedged) Accumulation. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFP.L and MIST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer