PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRFP.L is traded in GBp, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFP.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 28.47% return.


PRFP.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.58%
6M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.84%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
-1.28%
10Y*

IWVG.L

1D
-2.49%
1M
-4.98%
6M
24.42%
YTD
28.47%
1Y
54.93%
3Y*
25.26%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
-0.84%-4.46%6.43%3.44%-12.08%4.09%2.23%14.04%-25.47%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
28.47%31.27%6.58%13.08%1.04%21.24%-6.86%14.68%-8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFP.L and IWVG.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFP.L
PRFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFP.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.67

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

7.82

-7.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

25.39

-24.63

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFP.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFP.L drawdown since its inception was -33.34%, which is greater than IWVG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFP.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFP.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.34%

-28.07%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-6.99%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.79%

-13.92%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.03%

-13.92%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.04%

-6.26%

-12.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-4.29%

-11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

2.16%

+0.57%

Volatility

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (PRFP.L) is 2.64%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that PRFP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFP.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

6.15%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.89%

13.11%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

14.94%

-7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

13.44%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

15.68%

-0.66%

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFP.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFP.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

PRFP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than IWVG.L's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%
PRFP.L
Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF
5.58%5.38%5.08%5.39%5.57%4.36%4.81%4.64%5.05%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFP.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRFP.L.

PRFP.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRFP.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFP.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer