PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFHX vs. NMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Tax Free High Yield Fund (PRFHX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFHX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than NMZ's 3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFHX has outperformed NMZ with an annualized return of 3.06%, while NMZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


PRFHX

1D
0.18%
1M
1.06%
YTD
2.99%
6M
3.78%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
3.06%

NMZ

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.14%
YTD
3.29%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
-1.54%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFHX
T. Rowe Price Tax Free High Yield Fund
2.99%5.53%7.00%7.65%-14.41%6.09%3.40%9.03%0.66%7.31%
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
3.29%1.56%16.52%0.69%-27.36%10.41%7.33%28.36%-9.47%12.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFHX and NMZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2003

0.25

The correlation between PRFHX and NMZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFHX vs. NMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFHX
PRFHX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRFHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NMZ
NMZ Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Tax Free High Yield Fund (PRFHX) and Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFHXNMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

1.13

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.09

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

2.76

+12.73

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the NMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFHX and NMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFHXNMZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

0.69

+2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.12

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.18

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.27

+1.02

Drawdowns

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFHX drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum NMZ drawdown of -58.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFHX and NMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFHXNMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-58.53%

+33.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-5.94%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.91%

-21.56%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-40.03%

+21.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

-40.03%

+21.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.28%

+12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-9.47%

+6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

2.35%

-1.62%

Volatility

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Tax Free High Yield Fund (PRFHX) is 1.14%, while Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that PRFHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFHXNMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.84%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

7.28%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

9.40%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

12.94%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

14.76%

-10.11%

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFHX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than NMZ's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFHX vs. NMZ - Dividend Comparison

PRFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than NMZ's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMZ
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund
7.71%7.71%6.35%5.44%7.04%5.10%5.09%4.99%6.15%5.94%6.94%6.67%
PRFHX
T. Rowe Price Tax Free High Yield Fund
5.47%5.46%4.75%4.19%2.81%3.01%3.47%3.52%3.71%3.64%3.88%4.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFHX and NMZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMZ has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to PRFHX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFHX dropped -24.76% vs NMZ's -58.53%.

PRFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFHX and NMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer