PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFDX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFDX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFDX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


PRFDX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.91%
YTD
11.87%
6M
13.88%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.75%

TRLGX

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.03%
YTD
5.12%
6M
4.79%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
11.87%14.60%11.85%9.75%-3.25%25.60%1.28%33.66%-9.29%15.46%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.12%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFDX and TRLGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2001

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between PRFDX and TRLGX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFDX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFDX
PRFDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PRFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFDXTRLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.24

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.19

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

3.75

+8.50

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFDX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFDXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.38

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.58

+0.03

Drawdowns

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFDX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, roughly equal to the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFDX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-55.56%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-18.18%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-21.17%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-40.44%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

-40.44%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.90%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-8.68%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

5.72%

-3.76%

Volatility

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) is 2.99%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that PRFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.27%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

12.35%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

15.59%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

22.38%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

21.76%

-3.89%

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFDX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

PRFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than TRLGX's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
2.44%2.76%8.91%6.19%6.61%8.78%3.55%12.53%11.43%8.97%7.75%7.48%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.02%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFDX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLGX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to PRFDX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFDX dropped -58.12% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

PRFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFDX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer