PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFDX vs. FGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFDX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than FGINX's 17.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFDX has underperformed FGINX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while FGINX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


PRFDX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.91%
YTD
11.87%
6M
13.88%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.75%

FGINX

1D
0.92%
1M
7.14%
YTD
17.90%
6M
22.44%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
11.87%14.60%11.85%9.75%-3.25%25.60%1.28%33.66%-9.29%15.46%
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
17.90%29.78%15.13%11.98%3.03%21.37%-0.08%25.64%-10.27%18.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFDX and FGINX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 1993

0.91

The correlation between PRFDX and FGINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFDX vs. FGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFDX
PRFDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PRFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FGINX
FGINX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFDXFGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.72

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

6.20

-2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

23.67

-11.43

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the FGINX Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFDX and FGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFDXFGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

4.01

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

1.10

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.79

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.55

+0.05

Drawdowns

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFDX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, which is greater than FGINX's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFDX and FGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDXFGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-54.80%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-7.34%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-13.28%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-16.21%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

-37.37%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-9.70%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.91%

+0.05%

Volatility

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Delaware Growth and Income Fund (FGINX) at 2.79%. This indicates that PRFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDXFGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.79%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

8.23%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

11.36%

-0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

14.88%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

17.04%

+0.83%

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FGINX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFDX vs. FGINX - Dividend Comparison

PRFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than FGINX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGINX
Delaware Growth and Income Fund
9.64%11.28%12.40%7.11%7.04%11.97%6.59%51.75%25.36%5.13%4.12%5.66%
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
2.44%2.76%8.91%6.19%6.61%8.78%3.55%12.53%11.43%8.97%7.75%7.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFDX and FGINX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRFDX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to FGINX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFDX dropped -58.12% vs FGINX's -54.80%.

FGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFDX and FGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer