PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PREMX vs. GMCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PREMX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PREMX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than GMCDX's 8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PREMX has underperformed GMCDX with an annualized return of 4.58%, while GMCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.82% annualized return.


PREMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.25%
YTD
3.49%
6M
4.81%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
4.58%

GMCDX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.20%
YTD
8.34%
6M
9.25%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PREMX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund
3.49%16.55%10.84%18.52%-18.37%-2.44%4.63%11.34%-7.22%9.02%
GMCDX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund
8.34%22.34%13.39%17.63%-16.30%6.56%7.25%14.28%-5.89%12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PREMX and GMCDX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.82

The correlation between PREMX and GMCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PREMX vs. GMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PREMX
PREMX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PREMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PREMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PREMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PREMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PREMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GMCDX
GMCDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PREMX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PREMXGMCDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.56

5.07

-1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.85

9.08

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

2.27

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

6.93

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.78

30.08

-13.29

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PREMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is comparable to the GMCDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PREMX and GMCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PREMXGMCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

5.07

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.84

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.32

+0.55

Drawdowns

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PREMX drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum GMCDX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PREMX and GMCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PREMXGMCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.95%

-68.24%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.10%

-3.85%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.88%

-9.00%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-26.02%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.69%

-26.02%

-5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-17.66%

+12.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.89%

+0.06%

Volatility

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PREMX) has a higher volatility of 1.66% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund (GMCDX) at 1.53%. This indicates that PREMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PREMXGMCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.53%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

4.37%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

5.31%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

11.20%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.15%

9.33%

-2.18%

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PREMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GMCDX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

PREMX vs. GMCDX - Dividend Comparison

PREMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than GMCDX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMCDX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund
5.79%6.27%6.88%10.26%13.73%17.75%9.66%6.60%7.76%7.06%6.00%2.50%
PREMX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund
6.66%7.69%9.95%9.36%3.96%4.63%4.55%5.24%5.29%7.01%6.45%6.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


PREMX and GMCDX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PREMX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to GMCDX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PREMX dropped -43.95% vs GMCDX's -68.24%.

GMCDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.07 vs 3.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PREMX and GMCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer