PREAX vs. PCMNX
PREAX (PACE Global Real Estate Securities Investments) and PCMNX (PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments) are both mutual funds - PREAX is a REIT fund managed by UBS, while PCMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by UBS. Over the past 10 years, PREAX returned 1.95%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for PCMNX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PREAX charges 1.45%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for PCMNX.
Performance
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PREAX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than PCMNX's 1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PREAX has outperformed PCMNX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while PCMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.
PREAX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 6.35%
- 5Y*
- -1.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
PCMNX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PREAX PACE Global Real Estate Securities Investments | 7.01% | 3.29% | -3.16% | 10.93% | -27.85% | 32.65% | -11.23% | 20.46% | -8.44% | 6.62% |
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 1.36% | 4.52% | 0.85% | 5.54% | -7.30% | 0.70% | 4.63% | 7.32% | 0.85% | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PREAX and PCMNX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, PREAX and PCMNX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PREAX vs. PCMNX — Risk / Return Rank
PREAX
PCMNX
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Global Real Estate Securities Investments (PREAX) and PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PREAX | PCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.81 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 2.50 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 7.55 | -4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PREAX drawdown since its inception was -72.43%, which is greater than PCMNX's maximum drawdown of -11.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PREAX and PCMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PREAX | PCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.43% | -11.62% | -60.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -2.69% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.93% | -4.41% | -17.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.95% | -11.62% | -24.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.59% | -11.62% | -31.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -0.78% | -13.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.28% | -1.39% | -18.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 0.86% | +2.11% |
Volatility
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Volatility Comparison
PACE Global Real Estate Securities Investments (PREAX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments (PCMNX) at 0.54%. This indicates that PREAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PREAX | PCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 0.54% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.11% | 1.67% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 2.26% | +10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 3.07% | +13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 3.35% | +14.61% |
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PREAX has a 1.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PCMNX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
PREAX vs. PCMNX - Dividend Comparison
PREAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than PCMNX's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCMNX PACE Municipal Fixed Income Investments | 2.82% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 2.37% | 2.30% | 2.38% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 3.11% | 2.89% | 3.33% | 3.23% |
PREAX PACE Global Real Estate Securities Investments | 2.34% | 2.50% | 1.65% | 1.19% | 0.66% | 2.77% | 2.47% | 4.68% | 3.43% | 0.50% | 4.21% | 2.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PREAX and PCMNX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PREAX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to PCMNX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PREAX dropped -72.43% vs PCMNX's -11.62%.
PCMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PREAX and PCMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer