PRCS vs. FJUN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRCS (Parnassus Core Select ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PRCS is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Over the past year, PRCS returned 11.21% vs 12.54% for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRCS charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

PRCS vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCS achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than FJUN's 4.00% return.

PRCS

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 11.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCS vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PRCS Parnassus Core Select ETF	2.42%	11.69%	-4.25%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.00%	11.05%	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCS and FJUN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024	0.87

The correlation between PRCS and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRCS vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCS

PRCS Risk / Return Rank: 24
PRCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PRCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PRCS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PRCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
PRCS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 80
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCS vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRCS	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.23	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	3.38	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.48	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	3.05	-2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	17.51	-14.05

PRCS vs. FJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCS and FJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRCS vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCS drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCS and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRCS	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-13.26%	-4.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-4.13%	-8.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-0.97%	-1.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	-1.66%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	0.72%	+2.53%

Volatility

PRCS vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison

Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.94%. This indicates that PRCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRCS	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	0.94%	+3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.62%	4.40%	+6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	5.66%	+7.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	10.56%	+6.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	10.25%	+6.70%

PRCS vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRCS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRCS vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

PRCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%
PRCS Parnassus Core Select ETF	0.13%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRCS and FJUN in my portfolio?

PRCS and FJUN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRCS or FJUN?

PRCS has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FJUN (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCS dropped -18.20% vs FJUN's -13.26%.

Which ETF is better, PRCS or FJUN?

On 1-year performance, FJUN leads with 12.54% vs 11.21% for PRCS. On fees, PRCS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRCS or FJUN?

Over the 1-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRCS or FJUN?

PRCS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRCS or FJUN?

PRCS has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between PRCS and FJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PRCS and 0.85% for FJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.