PRBMX vs. MLLIX
PRBMX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund) and MLLIX (MFS Lifetime Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PRBMX returned 10.14%/yr vs 3.08%/yr for MLLIX. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PRBMX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MLLIX.
Performance
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRBMX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.73% return.
PRBMX
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 22.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.86%
MLLIX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.08%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRBMX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund | 12.31% | 20.74% | 14.85% | 20.06% | -16.80% | 18.66% | 13.41% | 0.00% |
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 3.73% | 9.32% | 5.62% | 9.12% | -11.99% | 6.63% | 10.06% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRBMX and MLLIX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PRBMX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRBMX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRBMX
MLLIX
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund (PRBMX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRBMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.01 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 8.83 | +2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRBMX drawdown since its inception was -32.13%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRBMX and MLLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRBMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.13% | -17.32% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -3.86% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.32% | -4.93% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.27% | -16.08% | -9.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.40% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -2.14% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 0.88% | +1.23% |
Volatility
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund (PRBMX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.11%. This indicates that PRBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRBMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 1.11% | +2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 3.67% | +6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.54% | 4.52% | +8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 5.95% | +8.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 5.71% | +11.40% |
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRBMX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRBMX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison
PRBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than MLLIX's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 7.41% | 6.01% | 6.26% | 3.70% | 3.92% | 6.12% | 3.18% | 3.80% | 4.20% | 3.56% | 4.21% | 2.51% |
PRBMX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2060 Fund | 3.25% | 3.01% | 3.56% | 1.53% | 1.60% | 10.13% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRBMX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRBMX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to MLLIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRBMX dropped -32.13% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.
PRBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRBMX and MLLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer