PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF (PRAZ.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAZ.DE achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.


PRAZ.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
4.74%
YTD
9.30%
6M
11.04%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

LYP6.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
3.11%
YTD
7.48%
6M
10.06%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRAZ.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF
9.30%24.75%9.66%19.29%-11.83%26.38%-4.68%
LYP6.DE
Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc
7.48%20.82%8.25%15.97%-10.40%24.81%-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.83

The correlation between PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAZ.DE
PRAZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PRAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LYP6.DE
LYP6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF (PRAZ.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRAZ.DELYP6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.74

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.54

6.63

-0.10

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRAZ.DELYP6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.28

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.52%, smaller than the maximum LYP6.DE drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAZ.DELYP6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.52%

-35.51%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.45%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

-16.26%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.09%

-20.71%

-3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.62%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-4.84%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.49%

+0.37%

Volatility

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF (PRAZ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that PRAZ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAZ.DELYP6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.35%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

10.65%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

12.90%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

14.41%

+2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

15.86%

+3.30%

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAZ.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRAZ.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAZ.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRAZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for LYP6.DE.

PRAZ.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRAZ.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAZ.DE and LYP6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer