PRASX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
PRASX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 27, 1990. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | -2.85% | 26.60% | 6.97% | 0.83% | -22.60% | -4.33% | 29.56% | 26.75% | -15.13% | 40.64% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -14.83% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRASX achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, PRASX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 6.90%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.26% annualized return.
PRASX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -13.71%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
TRLGX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -14.83%
- 6M
- -13.42%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRASX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
PRASX
TRLGX
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRASX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.40 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.74 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.29 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 0.96 | +4.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRASX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.40 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.41 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.54 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRASX and TRLGX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
PRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than TRLGX's 16.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | 0.64% | 0.62% | 1.05% | 1.77% | 1.96% | 14.22% | 0.46% | 0.77% | 7.23% | 9.15% | 0.46% | 1.31% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 16.07% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRASX drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRASX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRASX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -55.56% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -18.18% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -40.44% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -40.44% | -4.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.39% | -18.18% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -8.71% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 5.45% | -1.82% |
Volatility
PRASX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) has a higher volatility of 9.05% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 5.76%. This indicates that PRASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRASX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 5.76% | +3.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 11.86% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 21.86% | -3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 22.34% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 21.69% | -3.69% |