PRASX vs. FIQPX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX).
PRASX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 27, 1990. FIQPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | -2.85% | 26.60% | 6.97% | 0.83% | -22.60% | -4.33% | 29.56% | 26.75% | 0.49% |
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 0.95% | 37.22% | 21.13% | 13.98% | -30.50% | -14.73% | 73.23% | 31.17% | 0.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRASX achieves a -2.85% return, which is significantly lower than FIQPX's 0.95% return.
PRASX
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -13.71%
- YTD
- -2.85%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- -1.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.90%
FIQPX
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRASX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRASX vs. FIQPX — Risk / Return Rank
PRASX
FIQPX
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRASX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.65 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 2.19 | -0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.28 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 8.29 | -3.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRASX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.65 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.11 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.60 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRASX and FIQPX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Dividend Comparison
PRASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while FIQPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRASX T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund | 0.64% | 0.62% | 1.05% | 1.77% | 1.96% | 14.22% | 0.46% | 0.77% | 7.23% | 9.15% | 0.46% | 1.31% |
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.82% | 6.63% | 5.47% | 6.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRASX drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, which is greater than FIQPX's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRASX and FIQPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRASX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -57.62% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.39% | -13.52% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -53.21% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.39% | -13.52% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -22.55% | +3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.72% | -0.09% |
Volatility
PRASX vs. FIQPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price New Asia Fund (PRASX) is 9.05%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) has a volatility of 9.63%. This indicates that PRASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRASX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 9.63% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 14.66% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 20.33% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 22.56% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 22.85% | -4.85% |