PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE
PRAM.DE (Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C)) and XEMD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRAM.DE returned 20.14%/yr vs 20.80%/yr for XEMD.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRAM.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XEMD.DE.
Performance
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAM.DE achieves a 26.47% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD.DE's 28.06% return.
PRAM.DE
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 26.47%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- 1Y
- 47.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD.DE
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 28.06%
- 6M
- 29.15%
- 1Y
- 49.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.DE Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 26.47% | 17.03% | 13.52% | 7.05% | -12.45% | -1.59% |
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 28.06% | 18.67% | 13.85% | 5.68% | -14.85% | -1.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRAM.DE and XEMD.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PRAM.DE and XEMD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PRAM.DE
XEMD.DE
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRAM.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 4.60 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.90 | 16.76 | -0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRAM.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.77 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAM.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.90%, smaller than the maximum XEMD.DE drawdown of -23.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAM.DE and XEMD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRAM.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.90% | -23.50% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -10.72% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -19.19% | +0.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -2.54% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -9.22% | +1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.95% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRAM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) have volatilities of 7.09% and 7.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRAM.DE | XEMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 7.39% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.98% | 15.08% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 17.84% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 16.76% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 16.76% | +0.08% |
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAM.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRAM.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Dividend Comparison
PRAM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRAM.DE Amundi Prime Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 1.55% | 1.92% | 3.01% | 2.38% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PRAM.DE and XEMD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PRAM.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRAM.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XEMD.DE.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PRAM.DE and 0.18% for XEMD.DE.
Find the right allocation for PRAM.DE and XEMD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer