PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

PRAC.L (Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - PRAC.L tracks the Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc while XDEV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRAC.L returned -1.71%/yr vs 16.75%/yr for XDEV.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRAC.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.

Performance

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PRAC.L is traded in USD, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAC.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 30.33% return.

PRAC.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: -1.78%
• YTD: -0.60%
• 1Y: 2.67%
• 3Y*: 3.67%
• 5Y*: -1.71%
• 10Y*: —

XDEV.L

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -3.59%
• 6M: 26.45%
• YTD: 30.33%
• 1Y: 57.83%
• 3Y*: 26.88%
• 5Y*: 16.75%
• 10Y*: 12.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRAC.L Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc	-0.60%	2.50%	4.73%	9.42%	-21.50%	2.76%	5.68%	18.13%	-1.07%
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C	30.33%	40.36%	5.01%	19.23%	-9.79%	20.57%	-4.03%	19.16%	-4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PRAC.L and XDEV.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018	0.46

Return for Risk

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAC.L

PRAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 14
PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PRAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PRAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PRAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PRAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

XDEV.L

XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRAC.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	3.55	-3.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	4.83	-4.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.62	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	6.59	-6.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	23.86	-23.03

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAC.L and XDEV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAC.L drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.L and XDEV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRAC.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.92%	-50.32%	+19.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.32%	-8.73%	+2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.52%	-18.80%	+6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.91%	-26.72%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.17%	-3.88%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.28%	-21.78%	+13.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	2.42%	+0.80%

Volatility

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) is 1.99%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that PRAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRAC.L	XDEV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	5.95%	-3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	13.95%	-6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.50%	16.24%	-5.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.23%	20.88%	-9.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.77%	22.09%	-8.32%

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRAC.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRAC.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRAC.L and XDEV.L in my portfolio?

PRAC.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRAC.L or XDEV.L?

On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRAC.L or XDEV.L?

XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.L.

What is the main difference between PRAC.L and XDEV.L?

PRAC.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.