PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRAC.L is traded in USD, while MWOZ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MWOZ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRAC.L achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than MWOZ.L's 10.18% return.


PRAC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-1.78%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-1.71%
10Y*

MWOZ.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
9.01%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRAC.L and MWOZ.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRAC.L
PRAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MWOZ.L
MWOZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRAC.LMWOZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.33

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.55

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.83

10.83

-10.00

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the MWOZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRAC.L and MWOZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRAC.L drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, which is greater than MWOZ.L's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAC.L and MWOZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRAC.LMWOZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-17.73%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-8.81%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.17%

-0.23%

-8.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-2.00%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.07%

+1.15%

Volatility

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc (PRAC.L) is 1.99%, while Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Dist (MWOZ.L) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that PRAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MWOZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRAC.LMWOZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

3.05%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

9.24%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

11.99%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.23%

15.10%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.77%

15.10%

-1.33%

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRAC.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOZ.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRAC.L vs. MWOZ.L - Dividend Comparison

PRAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MWOZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRAC.L and MWOZ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWOZ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWOZ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PRAC.L.

PRAC.L tracks Invesco Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD Acc, while MWOZ.L tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PRAC.L and 0.05% for MWOZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRAC.L and MWOZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer